Branding in the Music Industry: What if the Stones Logo Never Existed? by Katrina Radic
  • July 4, 2012
  • ,

The inspiration for this article came from the fact that Shepard Fairey redesigned the old Rolling Stones logo a week or so ago, to commemorate the band’s 50th anniversary. As I stood there and looked at how the weirdly combined typography of the new logo actually looked pretty good, I couldn’t stop to think – what would be if there never was a Rolling Stones logo? Or, for example, if the thunder type of AC/DC or Metallica weren’t widely seen as symbols of a way of life on all those teens’ t-shirts?

The Rolling Stones 50th anniversary logo. There is also a website with various interpretations of the logo from designers around the world, while Suntory released a limited edition anniversary whiskey, with the bottle featuring the iconic logo.

As the logo is the starting point of any brand’s visual identity, branding a product is not making it look a certain way, yet making a certain feeling out of it, or, by consuming it, making it a way of life, a choice, a representation of yourself. A story. A statement. Knowing this, you can’t deny that a band logo like the one the Rolling Stones has wasn’t/isn’t just that. It symbolizes – to this day – a way of life; Everything they felt, they sang, they stood for. Everything you felt, you stood for, you sang along with them. And what if that symbol never existed?

Looking at other famous band logos, few of them say so much in so little like the Rolling Stones logo. The only symbol in music that has the same sense as the above mentioned logo – and that I could think of – is Pink Floyd’s Dark Side of the Moon album cover.

Although it’s not a logo literally, through the years it became a widely recognized symbol of Pink Floyd, thus making it not far away from a logo itself. Don’t get me wrong – these were the only two I could think of. If you can think of any other, please do share.

Browsing through symbols of famous bands I see a wide variety of logos, but I think most of them don’t have the potential to be a symbol of a state of mind, a real brand, like the Stones. Is this because of the logos themselves; Should they include more of a story then just certain type or pictograms? Or is it because the music industry just, well, ain’t what it used to be?

I think we all know that it ain’t, but then another question rises – why?

The obvious answer is that there isn’t that much of a demand for a “state-of-mind” band that would unite people in a mutual, well, state of mind. At the expense of sounding like a grumpy senior, I have to state that most of today’s music is pretty much the same old thing over and over again, no soul, no heart, no quality. The bands/singers are brands, and they are storytelling, but are they really what they used to be? Or is it just that the grass is always greener, culturally, in past times? Woody Allen’s Midnight in Paris explores this thought quite well.

Or maybe we are overwhelmed with the music industry working like never before, constantly throwing new (yet same?) music to us? As one of our authors writes, nobody really listens to music anymore. That’s where, theoretically, the lack of branding in music comes from today, if there, theoretically was one. We can’t see a true feeling or meaning of a band anymore, because, the feeling/meaning, thus the brand – does not exist in our musically-overwhelmed world.

Interesting read? Share it:

Katrina Radic
Katrina is a graphic designer based in Belgrade, Serbia. Mixing the two worlds, creative and corporate, she delivers the freshest and most creative news from the industry to the readers of Branding Magazine.
  • http://twitter.com/LuisBeirana Luis Casb Beirana

    What is your opinion on Lady Gaga or Justin Bieber? They don’t have logos but they have the ’little monsters’ and ‘beliebers’ statements that are apparently growing. Perhaps they’re based on superficiality or they’re not exactly deep or humane. But they’re definitely something that can create a strong branding. But will it last? Is there a ‘state-of-mind’ hidden in their superficiality that our likewise superficial society has? Or they’ll lose their strength eventually and never gain immortality like the Rolling Stones or Pink Floyd? What do you think?

    • katrinaradic

      Hey Luis, great observation and question!
      I, personally, see Lady Gaga and Justin Bieber as two very different potential ‘brands’.
      Why? Bieber is the same as Britney Spears or Justin Timberlake – he is a potential ’brand for himself’ but what kind of history and legacy can he make singing about how he saw a girl and fell in love with her over and OVER again. We’ve all seen and heard that a gazillion times, and it’s nothing new. Therefore he is a recycled product.
      On the other hand Lady Gaga is a greater ‘potential’ brand since she managed to shock in an “un-shockable” world where everything is mostly already seen. Also, she does have strong statements that are very connected to today’s world, problems and social behavior (for example pro homosexuality or the “be what you are no matter who thinks what” statements, which are very sensitive issues today since a lot of people have problems with them or fight them). Thus, not very gladly though, I came to the conclusion that Lady Gaga will (maybe) actually be, theoretically, very similar to the ‘brand’ of the Rolling Stones some day, as she is somewhat of a voice of a generation, its problems, the fight for social freedom and some kind of rebelliousness.
      Of course these two (The Rolling Stones and Lady Gaga) can’t be compared directly since they are very different in genre,
      overall statement and ‘feeling’ and place in time. But, who knows, maybe Lady Gaga will be the Rolling Stones of the next generation?

  • Krishna Darlene

    Luv this article! Many people don’t get that a logo or album cover art needs to evoke emotion that is connected to the project and it’s positioning. Often people tend to throw up text + photoshop edits and miss a prime opportunity for people to connect to the Artist and their music; but more importantly they miss out on an opportunity to position themselves as Iconic.

    Thank you for writing.